Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons in General Graphs and Graphs with Locality

Yanxi Chen
4/13/2023
stat.MLcs.LGmath.ST

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This technical report studies the problem of ranking from pairwise comparisons in the classical Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model, with a focus on score estimation. For general graphs, we show that, with sufficiently many samples, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) achieves an entrywise estimation error matching the Cramér-Rao lower bound, which can be stated in terms of effective resistances; the key to our analysis is a connection between statistical estimation and iterative optimization by preconditioned gradient descent. We are also particularly interested in graphs with locality, where only nearby items can be connected by edges; our analysis identifies conditions under which locality does not hurt, i.e. comparing the scores between a pair of items that are far apart in the graph is nearly as easy as comparing a pair of nearby items. We further explore divide-and-conquer algorithms that can provably achieve similar guarantees even in the regime with the sparsest samples, while enjoying certain computational advantages. Numerical results validate our theory and confirm the efficacy of the proposed algorithms.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2023ranking,
  title  = {Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons in General Graphs and Graphs with Locality},
  author = {Yanxi Chen},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.06821},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06821v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.06821.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.06821)

Discussion