Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation

Giovana Morais, Matthew E. P. Davies, Marcelo Queiroz, Magdalena Fuentes
4/14/2023
cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS

No official code found. Best implementation: giovana-morais/steme (13 stars, last commit 2023-08-02).

Abstract

Self-supervision methods learn representations by solving pretext tasks that do not require human-generated labels, alleviating the need for time-consuming annotations. These methods have been applied in computer vision, natural language processing, environmental sound analysis, and recently in music information retrieval, e.g. for pitch estimation. Particularly in the context of music, there are few insights about the fragility of these models regarding different distributions of data, and how they could be mitigated. In this paper, we explore these questions by dissecting a self-supervised model for pitch estimation adapted for tempo estimation via rigorous experimentation with synthetic data. Specifically, we study the relationship between the input representation and data distribution for self-supervised tempo estimation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

[ICASSP 2023] Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation

132Shell, PythonOct 25, 20223 years ago
python

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{morais2023tempo,
  title  = {Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation},
  author = {Giovana Morais and Matthew E. P. Davies and Marcelo Queiroz and Magdalena Fuentes},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.06868},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06868v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.06868.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.06868)

Discussion