S3M: Scalable Statistical Shape Modeling through Unsupervised Correspondences

Lennart Bastian, Alexander Baumann, Emily Hoppe, Vincent Bürgin, Ha Young Kim +3 more
4/15/2023
cs.CVcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: alexanderbaumann99/S3M (18 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-01-19).

Abstract

Statistical shape models (SSMs) are an established way to represent the anatomy of a population with various clinically relevant applications. However, they typically require domain expertise, and labor-intensive landmark annotations to construct. We address these shortcomings by proposing an unsupervised method that leverages deep geometric features and functional correspondences to simultaneously learn local and global shape structures across population anatomies. Our pipeline significantly improves unsupervised correspondence estimation for SSMs compared to baseline methods, even on highly irregular surface topologies. We demonstrate this for two different anatomical structures: the thyroid and a multi-chamber heart dataset. Furthermore, our method is robust enough to learn from noisy neural network predictions, potentially enabling scaling SSMs to larger patient populations without manual segmentation annotation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

Implementation of MICCAI'23: S3M: Scalable Statistical Shape Modeling through Unsupervised Correspondences

181PythonAug 22, 20232 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bastian2023sm,
  title  = {S3M: Scalable Statistical Shape Modeling through Unsupervised Correspondences},
  author = {Lennart Bastian and Alexander Baumann and Emily Hoppe and Vincent Bürgin and Ha Young Kim and Mahdi Saleh and Benjamin Busam and Nassir Navab},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.07515},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07515v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.07515.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.07515)

Discussion