What Makes a Good Dataset for Symbol Description Reading?

Karol Lynch, Joern Ploennigs, Bradley Eck
4/17/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The usage of mathematical formulas as concise representations of a document's key ideas is common practice. Correctly interpreting these formulas, by identifying mathematical symbols and extracting their descriptions, is an important task in document understanding. This paper makes the following contributions to the mathematical identifier description reading (MIDR) task: (i) introduces the Math Formula Question Answering Dataset (MFQuAD) with $7508$ annotated identifier occurrences; (ii) describes novel variations of the noun phrase ranking approach for the MIDR task; (iii) reports experimental results for the SOTA noun phrase ranking approach and our novel variations of the approach, providing problem insights and a performance baseline; (iv) provides a position on the features that make an effective dataset for the MIDR task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lynch2023what,
  title  = {What Makes a Good Dataset for Symbol Description Reading?},
  author = {Karol Lynch and Joern Ploennigs and Bradley Eck},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.08352},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08352v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.08352.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.08352)

Discussion