What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?

Haiyu Wu, Kevin W. Bowyer
4/17/2023
cs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: HaiyuWu/BA-test-dataset (3 stars, last commit 2024-01-10).

Abstract

The issue of demographic disparities in face recognition accuracy has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Various face image datasets have been proposed as 'fair' or 'balanced' to assess the accuracy of face recognition algorithms across demographics. These datasets typically balance the number of identities and images across demographics. It is important to note that the number of identities and images in an evaluation dataset are {\em not} driving factors for 1-to-1 face matching accuracy. Moreover, balancing the number of identities and images does not ensure balance in other factors known to impact accuracy, such as head pose, brightness, and image quality. We demonstrate these issues using several recently proposed datasets. To improve the ability to perform less biased evaluations, we propose a bias-aware toolkit that facilitates creation of cross-demographic evaluation datasets balanced on factors mentioned in this paper.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

The official repository of "What Should be Balanced in a "Balanced'' Dataset?" at BMVC2023

30PythonJul 15, 20232 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wu2023what,
  title  = {What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?},
  author = {Haiyu Wu and Kevin W. Bowyer},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.09818},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09818v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.09818.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.09818)

Discussion