Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Providing Truthful Answers?

Shen Zheng, Jie Huang, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
4/20/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models, such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated significant potential to impact various aspects of human life. However, ChatGPT still faces challenges in providing reliable and accurate answers to user questions. To better understand the model's particular weaknesses in providing truthful answers, we embark an in-depth exploration of open-domain question answering. Specifically, we undertake a detailed examination of ChatGPT's failures, categorized into: comprehension, factuality, specificity, and inference. We further pinpoint factuality as the most contributing failure and identify two critical abilities associated with factuality: knowledge memorization and knowledge recall. Through experiments focusing on factuality, we propose several potential enhancement strategies. Our findings suggest that augmenting the model with granular external knowledge and cues for knowledge recall can enhance the model's factuality in answering questions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zheng2023does,
  title  = {Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Providing Truthful Answers?},
  author = {Shen Zheng and Jie Huang and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.10513},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10513v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.10513.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.10513)

Discussion