Creating Large Language Model Resistant Exams: Guidelines and Strategies

Simon kaare Larsen
4/18/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has raised concerns about their potential impact on academic integrity, prompting the need for LLM-resistant exam designs. This article investigates the performance of LLMs on exams and their implications for assessment, focusing on ChatGPT's abilities and limitations. We propose guidelines for creating LLM-resistant exams, including content moderation, deliberate inaccuracies, real-world scenarios beyond the model's knowledge base, effective distractor options, evaluating soft skills, and incorporating non-textual information. The article also highlights the significance of adapting assessments to modern tools and promoting essential skills development in students. By adopting these strategies, educators can maintain academic integrity while ensuring that assessments accurately reflect contemporary professional settings and address the challenges and opportunities posed by artificial intelligence in education.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{larsen2023creating,
  title  = {Creating Large Language Model Resistant Exams: Guidelines and Strategies},
  author = {Simon kaare Larsen},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.12203},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.12203v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.12203.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.12203)

Discussion