Standpoint Linear Temporal Logic

Nicola Gigante, Lucia {Gomez Alvarez}, Tim S. Lyon
4/27/2023
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Many complex scenarios require the coordination of agents possessing unique points of view and distinct semantic commitments. In response, standpoint logic (SL) was introduced in the context of knowledge integration, allowing one to reason with diverse and potentially conflicting viewpoints by means of indexed modalities. Another multi-modal logic of import is linear temporal logic (LTL) - a formalism used to express temporal properties of systems and processes, having prominence in formal methods and fields related to artificial intelligence. In this paper, we present standpoint linear temporal logic (SLTL), a new logic that combines the temporal features of LTL with the multi-perspective modelling capacity of SL. We define the logic SLTL, its syntax, and its semantics, establish its decidability and complexity, and provide a terminating tableau calculus to automate SLTL reasoning. Conveniently, this offers a clear path to extend existing LTL reasoners with practical reasoning support for temporal reasoning in multi-perspective settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gigante2023standpoint,
  title  = {Standpoint Linear Temporal Logic},
  author = {Nicola Gigante and Lucia {Gomez Alvarez} and Tim S. Lyon},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2304.14243},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14243v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2304.14243.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2304.14243)

Discussion