Activation Functions Not To Active: A Plausible Theory on Interpreting Neural Networks

John Chiang
5/1/2023
cs.LGcs.NE

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Researchers commonly believe that neural networks model a high-dimensional space but cannot give a clear definition of this space. What is this space? What is its dimension? And does it has finite dimensions? In this paper, we develop a plausible theory on interpreting neural networks in terms of the role of activation functions in neural networks and define a high-dimensional (more precisely, an infinite-dimensional) space that neural networks including deep-learning networks could create. We show that the activation function acts as a magnifying function that maps the low-dimensional linear space into an infinite-dimensional space, which can distinctly identify the polynomial approximation of any multivariate continuous function of the variable values being the same features of the given dataset. Given a dataset with each example of $d$ features $f_1$, $f_2$, $\cdots$, $f_d$, we believe that neural networks model a special space with infinite dimensions, each of which is a monomial $$\prod_{i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_d} f_1^{i_1} f_2^{i_2} \cdots f_d^{i_d}$$ for some non-negative integers ${i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_d} \in \mathbb{Z}_{0}^{+}=\{0,1,2,3,\ldots\} $. We term such an infinite-dimensional space a $\textit{ Super Space (SS)}$. We see such a dimension as the minimum information unit. Every neuron node previously through an activation layer in neural networks is a $\textit{ Super Plane (SP) }$, which is actually a polynomial of infinite degree. This $\textit{ Super Space }$ is something like a coordinate system, in which every multivalue function can be represented by a $\textit{ Super Plane }$. We also show that training NNs could at least be reduced to solving a system of nonlinear equations. %solve sets of nonlinear equations

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{chiang2023activation,
  title  = {Activation Functions Not To Active: A Plausible Theory on Interpreting Neural Networks},
  author = {John Chiang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.00663},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00663v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.00663.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.00663)

Discussion