Streaming PCA for Markovian Data

Syamantak Kumar, Purnamrita Sarkar
5/3/2023
math.STcs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Since its inception in 1982, Oja's algorithm has become an established method for streaming principle component analysis (PCA). We study the problem of streaming PCA, where the data-points are sampled from an irreducible, aperiodic, and reversible Markov chain. Our goal is to estimate the top eigenvector of the unknown covariance matrix of the stationary distribution. This setting has implications in scenarios where data can solely be sampled from a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) type algorithm, and the objective is to perform inference on parameters of the stationary distribution. Most convergence guarantees for Oja's algorithm in the literature assume that the data-points are sampled IID. For data streams with Markovian dependence, one typically downsamples the data to get a "nearly" independent data stream. In this paper, we obtain the first sharp rate for Oja's algorithm on the entire data, where we remove the logarithmic dependence on the sample size, $n$, resulting from throwing data away in downsampling strategies.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kumar2023streaming,
  title  = {Streaming PCA for Markovian Data},
  author = {Syamantak Kumar and Purnamrita Sarkar},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.02456},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02456v2},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.02456.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.02456)

Discussion