New metrics and search algorithms for weighted causal DAGs

Davin Choo, Kirankumar Shiragur
5/8/2023
cs.LGcs.AIcs.DS

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recovering causal relationships from data is an important problem. Using observational data, one can typically only recover causal graphs up to a Markov equivalence class and additional assumptions or interventional data are needed for complete recovery. In this work, under some standard assumptions, we study causal graph discovery via adaptive interventions with node-dependent interventional costs. For this setting, we show that no algorithm can achieve an approximation guarantee that is asymptotically better than linear in the number of vertices with respect to the verification number; a well-established benchmark for adaptive search algorithms. Motivated by this negative result, we define a new benchmark that captures the worst-case interventional cost for any search algorithm. Furthermore, with respect to this new benchmark, we provide adaptive search algorithms that achieve logarithmic approximations under various settings: atomic, bounded size interventions and generalized cost objectives.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{choo2023metrics,
  title  = {New metrics and search algorithms for weighted causal DAGs},
  author = {Davin Choo and Kirankumar Shiragur},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.04445},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04445v2},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.04445.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.04445)

Discussion