GeoGLUE: A GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark

Dongyang Li, Ruixue Ding, Qiang Zhang, Zheng Li, Boli Chen +6 more
5/11/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

With a fast developing pace of geographic applications, automatable and intelligent models are essential to be designed to handle the large volume of information. However, few researchers focus on geographic natural language processing, and there has never been a benchmark to build a unified standard. In this work, we propose a GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, named GeoGLUE. We collect data from open-released geographic resources and introduce six natural language understanding tasks, including geographic textual similarity on recall, geographic textual similarity on rerank, geographic elements tagging, geographic composition analysis, geographic where what cut, and geographic entity alignment. We also pro vide evaluation experiments and analysis of general baselines, indicating the effectiveness and significance of the GeoGLUE benchmark.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2023geoglue,
  title  = {GeoGLUE: A GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark},
  author = {Dongyang Li and Ruixue Ding and Qiang Zhang and Zheng Li and Boli Chen and Pengjun Xie and Yao Xu and Xin Li and Ning Guo and Fei Huang and Xiaofeng He},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.06545},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06545v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.06545.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.06545)

Discussion