Is end-to-end learning enough for fitness activity recognition?

Antoine Mercier, Guillaume Berger, Sunny Panchal, Florian Letsch, Cornelius Boehm +3 more
5/14/2023
cs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

End-to-end learning has taken hold of many computer vision tasks, in particular, related to still images, with task-specific optimization yielding very strong performance. Nevertheless, human-centric action recognition is still largely dominated by hand-crafted pipelines, and only individual components are replaced by neural networks that typically operate on individual frames. As a testbed to study the relevance of such pipelines, we present a new fully annotated video dataset of fitness activities. Any recognition capabilities in this domain are almost exclusively a function of human poses and their temporal dynamics, so pose-based solutions should perform well. We show that, with this labelled data, end-to-end learning on raw pixels can compete with state-of-the-art action recognition pipelines based on pose estimation. We also show that end-to-end learning can support temporally fine-grained tasks such as real-time repetition counting.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mercier2023endtoend,
  title  = {Is end-to-end learning enough for fitness activity recognition?},
  author = {Antoine Mercier and Guillaume Berger and Sunny Panchal and Florian Letsch and Cornelius Boehm and Nahua Kang and Ingo Bax and Roland Memisevic},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.08191},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08191v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.08191.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.08191)

Discussion