Uniform-PAC Guarantees for Model-Based RL with Bounded Eluder Dimension

Yue Wu, Jiafan He, Quanquan Gu
5/15/2023
cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recently, there has been remarkable progress in reinforcement learning (RL) with general function approximation. However, all these works only provide regret or sample complexity guarantees. It is still an open question if one can achieve stronger performance guarantees, i.e., the uniform probably approximate correctness (Uniform-PAC) guarantee that can imply both a sub-linear regret bound and a polynomial sample complexity for any target learning accuracy. We study this problem by proposing algorithms for both nonlinear bandits and model-based episodic RL using the general function class with a bounded eluder dimension. The key idea of the proposed algorithms is to assign each action to different levels according to its width with respect to the confidence set. The achieved uniform-PAC sample complexity is tight in the sense that it matches the state-of-the-art regret bounds or sample complexity guarantees when reduced to the linear case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work for uniform-PAC guarantees on bandit and RL that goes beyond linear cases.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wu2023uniformpac,
  title  = {Uniform-PAC Guarantees for Model-Based RL with Bounded Eluder Dimension},
  author = {Yue Wu and Jiafan He and Quanquan Gu},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.08350},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08350v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.08350.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.08350)

Discussion