Gaussian Process Port-Hamiltonian Systems: Bayesian Learning with Physics Prior

Thomas Beckers, Jacob Seidman, Paris Perdikaris, George J. Pappas
5/15/2023
eess.SYcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Data-driven approaches achieve remarkable results for the modeling of complex dynamics based on collected data. However, these models often neglect basic physical principles which determine the behavior of any real-world system. This omission is unfavorable in two ways: The models are not as data-efficient as they could be by incorporating physical prior knowledge, and the model itself might not be physically correct. We propose Gaussian Process Port-Hamiltonian systems (GP-PHS) as a physics-informed Bayesian learning approach with uncertainty quantification. The Bayesian nature of GP-PHS uses collected data to form a distribution over all possible Hamiltonians instead of a single point estimate. Due to the underlying physics model, a GP-PHS generates passive systems with respect to designated inputs and outputs. Further, the proposed approach preserves the compositional nature of Port-Hamiltonian systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{beckers2023gaussian,
  title  = {Gaussian Process Port-Hamiltonian Systems: Bayesian Learning with Physics Prior},
  author = {Thomas Beckers and Jacob Seidman and Paris Perdikaris and George J. Pappas},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.09017},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09017v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.09017.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.09017)

Discussion