Attributable and Scalable Opinion Summarization

Tom Hosking, Hao Tang, Mirella Lapata
5/19/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: tomhosking/hercules (20 stars, MIT, last commit 2023-11-08).

Abstract

We propose a method for unsupervised opinion summarization that encodes sentences from customer reviews into a hierarchical discrete latent space, then identifies common opinions based on the frequency of their encodings. We are able to generate both abstractive summaries by decoding these frequent encodings, and extractive summaries by selecting the sentences assigned to the same frequent encodings. Our method is attributable, because the model identifies sentences used to generate the summary as part of the summarization process. It scales easily to many hundreds of input reviews, because aggregation is performed in the latent space rather than over long sequences of tokens. We also demonstrate that our appraoch enables a degree of control, generating aspect-specific summaries by restricting the model to parts of the encoding space that correspond to desired aspects (e.g., location or food). Automatic and human evaluation on two datasets from different domains demonstrates that our method generates summaries that are more informative than prior work and better grounded in the input reviews.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

tomhosking/herculesCommunity100%
MIT

Hercules: Attributable and Scalable Opinion Summarization (ACL 2023)

204HTML, ShellDec 2, 20222 years agoMIT
nlpopinion-summarizationsummarizationvq-vae

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hosking2023attributable,
  title  = {Attributable and Scalable Opinion Summarization},
  author = {Tom Hosking and Hao Tang and Mirella Lapata},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.11603},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11603v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.11603.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.11603)

Discussion