Evaluation of medium-large Language Models at zero-shot closed book generative question answering

René Peinl, Johannes Wirth
5/19/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention, but the definition of "large" lacks clarity. This paper focuses on medium-sized language models (MLMs), defined as having at least six billion parameters but less than 100 billion. The study evaluates MLMs regarding zero-shot generative question answering, which requires models to provide elaborate answers without external document retrieval. The paper introduces an own test dataset and presents results from human evaluation. Results show that combining the best answers from different MLMs yielded an overall correct answer rate of 82.7% which is better than the 60.9% of ChatGPT. The best MLM achieved 71.8% and has 33B parameters, which highlights the importance of using appropriate training data for fine-tuning rather than solely relying on the number of parameters. More fine-grained feedback should be used to further improve the quality of answers. The open source community is quickly closing the gap to the best commercial models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{peinl2023evaluation,
  title  = {Evaluation of medium-large Language Models at zero-shot closed book generative question answering},
  author = {René Peinl and Johannes Wirth},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.11991},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11991v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.11991.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.11991)

Discussion