A comprehensive theoretical framework for the optimization of neural networks classification performance with respect to weighted metrics

Francesco Marchetti, Sabrina Guastavino, Cristina Campi, Federico Benvenuto, Michele Piana
5/22/2023
cs.LGmath.NAstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In many contexts, customized and weighted classification scores are designed in order to evaluate the goodness of the predictions carried out by neural networks. However, there exists a discrepancy between the maximization of such scores and the minimization of the loss function in the training phase. In this paper, we provide a complete theoretical setting that formalizes weighted classification metrics and then allows the construction of losses that drive the model to optimize these metrics of interest. After a detailed theoretical analysis, we show that our framework includes as particular instances well-established approaches such as classical cost-sensitive learning, weighted cross entropy loss functions and value-weighted skill scores.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{marchetti2023comprehensive,
  title  = {A comprehensive theoretical framework for the optimization of neural networks classification performance with respect to weighted metrics},
  author = {Francesco Marchetti and Sabrina Guastavino and Cristina Campi and Federico Benvenuto and Michele Piana},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.13472},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13472v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.13472.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.13472)

Discussion