Statistical Indistinguishability of Learning Algorithms

Alkis Kalavasis, Amin Karbasi, Shay Moran, Grigoris Velegkas
5/23/2023
cs.LGcs.DSstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

When two different parties use the same learning rule on their own data, how can we test whether the distributions of the two outcomes are similar? In this paper, we study the similarity of outcomes of learning rules through the lens of the Total Variation (TV) distance of distributions. We say that a learning rule is TV indistinguishable if the expected TV distance between the posterior distributions of its outputs, executed on two training data sets drawn independently from the same distribution, is small. We first investigate the learnability of hypothesis classes using TV indistinguishable learners. Our main results are information-theoretic equivalences between TV indistinguishability and existing algorithmic stability notions such as replicability and approximate differential privacy. Then, we provide statistical amplification and boosting algorithms for TV indistinguishable learners.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kalavasis2023statistical,
  title  = {Statistical Indistinguishability of Learning Algorithms},
  author = {Alkis Kalavasis and Amin Karbasi and Shay Moran and Grigoris Velegkas},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.14311},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14311v1},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.14311.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.14311)

Discussion