Are Large Language Models Robust Coreference Resolvers?

Nghia T. Le, Alan Ritter
5/23/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: nle18/coref-llms (7 stars, last commit 2024-04-14).

Abstract

Recent work on extending coreference resolution across domains and languages relies on annotated data in both the target domain and language. At the same time, pre-trained large language models (LMs) have been reported to exhibit strong zero- and few-shot learning abilities across a wide range of NLP tasks. However, prior work mostly studied this ability using artificial sentence-level datasets such as the Winograd Schema Challenge. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of prompt-based coreference resolution by evaluating instruction-tuned language models on difficult, linguistically-complex coreference benchmarks (e.g., CoNLL-2012). We show that prompting for coreference can outperform current unsupervised coreference systems, although this approach appears to be reliant on high-quality mention detectors. Further investigations reveal that instruction-tuned LMs generalize surprisingly well across domains, languages, and time periods; yet continued fine-tuning of neural models should still be preferred if small amounts of annotated examples are available.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

nle18/coref-llmsCommunity100%
72PythonNov 15, 20232 years ago

Cite this paper

@article{le2023large,
  title  = {Are Large Language Models Robust Coreference Resolvers?},
  author = {Nghia T. Le and Alan Ritter},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.14489},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14489v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.14489.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.14489)

Discussion