Revisiting non-English Text Simplification: A Unified Multilingual Benchmark

Michael J. Ryan, Tarek Naous, Wei Xu
5/25/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: XenonMolecule/MultiSim (12 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-10-23).

Abstract

Recent advancements in high-quality, large-scale English resources have pushed the frontier of English Automatic Text Simplification (ATS) research. However, less work has been done on multilingual text simplification due to the lack of a diverse evaluation benchmark that covers complex-simple sentence pairs in many languages. This paper introduces the MultiSim benchmark, a collection of 27 resources in 12 distinct languages containing over 1.7 million complex-simple sentence pairs. This benchmark will encourage research in developing more effective multilingual text simplification models and evaluation metrics. Our experiments using MultiSim with pre-trained multilingual language models reveal exciting performance improvements from multilingual training in non-English settings. We observe strong performance from Russian in zero-shot cross-lingual transfer to low-resource languages. We further show that few-shot prompting with BLOOM-176b achieves comparable quality to reference simplifications outperforming fine-tuned models in most languages. We validate these findings through human evaluation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

Code and Data for using the MultiSim Benchmark

124Python, Jupyter NotebookMay 18, 20231 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ryan2023revisiting,
  title  = {Revisiting non-English Text Simplification: A Unified Multilingual Benchmark},
  author = {Michael J. Ryan and Tarek Naous and Wei Xu},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.15678},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15678v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.15678.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.15678)

Discussion