Give Me More Details: Improving Fact-Checking with Latent Retrieval

Xuming Hu, Junzhe Chen, Zhijiang Guo, Philip S. Yu
5/25/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Evidence plays a crucial role in automated fact-checking. When verifying real-world claims, existing fact-checking systems either assume the evidence sentences are given or use the search snippets returned by the search engine. Such methods ignore the challenges of collecting evidence and may not provide sufficient information to verify real-world claims. Aiming at building a better fact-checking system, we propose to incorporate full text from source documents as evidence and introduce two enriched datasets. The first one is a multilingual dataset, while the second one is monolingual (English). We further develop a latent variable model to jointly extract evidence sentences from documents and perform claim verification. Experiments indicate that including source documents can provide sufficient contextual clues even when gold evidence sentences are not annotated. The proposed system is able to achieve significant improvements upon best-reported models under different settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hu2023give,
  title  = {Give Me More Details: Improving Fact-Checking with Latent Retrieval},
  author = {Xuming Hu and Junzhe Chen and Zhijiang Guo and Philip S. Yu},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.16128},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16128v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.16128.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.16128)

Discussion