Handling Realistic Label Noise in BERT Text Classification

Maha Tufail Agro, Hanan Aldarmaki
5/23/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Labels noise refers to errors in training labels caused by cheap data annotation methods, such as web scraping or crowd-sourcing, which can be detrimental to the performance of supervised classifiers. Several methods have been proposed to counteract the effect of random label noise in supervised classification, and some studies have shown that BERT is already robust against high rates of randomly injected label noise. However, real label noise is not random; rather, it is often correlated with input features or other annotator-specific factors. In this paper, we evaluate BERT in the presence of two types of realistic label noise: feature-dependent label noise, and synthetic label noise from annotator disagreements. We show that the presence of these types of noise significantly degrades BERT classification performance. To improve robustness, we evaluate different types of ensembles and noise-cleaning methods and compare their effectiveness against label noise across different datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{agro2023handling,
  title  = {Handling Realistic Label Noise in BERT Text Classification},
  author = {Maha Tufail Agro and Hanan Aldarmaki},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.16337},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16337v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.16337.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.16337)

Discussion