Reducing Communication for Split Learning by Randomized Top-k Sparsification

Fei Zheng, Chaochao Chen, Lingjuan Lyu, Binhui Yao
5/29/2023
cs.LGcs.DC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Split learning is a simple solution for Vertical Federated Learning (VFL), which has drawn substantial attention in both research and application due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, communication efficiency is still a crucial issue for split learning. In this paper, we investigate multiple communication reduction methods for split learning, including cut layer size reduction, top-k sparsification, quantization, and L1 regularization. Through analysis of the cut layer size reduction and top-k sparsification, we further propose randomized top-k sparsification, to make the model generalize and converge better. This is done by selecting top-k elements with a large probability while also having a small probability to select non-top-k elements. Empirical results show that compared with other communication-reduction methods, our proposed randomized top-k sparsification achieves a better model performance under the same compression level.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{zheng2023reducing,
  title  = {Reducing Communication for Split Learning by Randomized Top-k Sparsification},
  author = {Fei Zheng and Chaochao Chen and Lingjuan Lyu and Binhui Yao},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.18469},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18469v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.18469.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.18469)

Discussion