Generalized equivalences between subsampling and ridge regularization

Pratik Patil, Jin-Hong Du
5/29/2023
math.STcs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We establish precise structural and risk equivalences between subsampling and ridge regularization for ensemble ridge estimators. Specifically, we prove that linear and quadratic functionals of subsample ridge estimators, when fitted with different ridge regularization levels $λ$ and subsample aspect ratios $ψ$, are asymptotically equivalent along specific paths in the $(λ,ψ)$-plane (where $ψ$ is the ratio of the feature dimension to the subsample size). Our results only require bounded moment assumptions on feature and response distributions and allow for arbitrary joint distributions. Furthermore, we provide a data-dependent method to determine the equivalent paths of $(λ,ψ)$. An indirect implication of our equivalences is that optimally tuned ridge regression exhibits a monotonic prediction risk in the data aspect ratio. This resolves a recent open problem raised by Nakkiran et al. for general data distributions under proportional asymptotics, assuming a mild regularity condition that maintains regression hardness through linearized signal-to-noise ratios.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{patil2023generalized,
  title  = {Generalized equivalences between subsampling and ridge regularization},
  author = {Pratik Patil and Jin-Hong Du},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.18496},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18496v2},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.18496.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.18496)

Discussion