Signal Is Harder To Learn Than Bias: Debiasing with Focal Loss

Moritz Vandenhirtz, Laura Manduchi, Ričards Marcinkevičs, Julia E. Vogt
5/31/2023
cs.LGcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Spurious correlations are everywhere. While humans often do not perceive them, neural networks are notorious for learning unwanted associations, also known as biases, instead of the underlying decision rule. As a result, practitioners are often unaware of the biased decision-making of their classifiers. Such a biased model based on spurious correlations might not generalize to unobserved data, leading to unintended, adverse consequences. We propose Signal is Harder (SiH), a variational-autoencoder-based method that simultaneously trains a biased and unbiased classifier using a novel, disentangling reweighting scheme inspired by the focal loss. Using the unbiased classifier, SiH matches or improves upon the performance of state-of-the-art debiasing methods. To improve the interpretability of our technique, we propose a perturbation scheme in the latent space for visualizing the bias that helps practitioners become aware of the sources of spurious correlations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{vandenhirtz2023signal,
  title  = {Signal Is Harder To Learn Than Bias: Debiasing with Focal Loss},
  author = {Moritz Vandenhirtz and Laura Manduchi and Ričards Marcinkevičs and Julia E. Vogt},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.19671},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19671v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.19671.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.19671)

Discussion