Is novelty predictable?

Clara Fannjiang, Jennifer Listgarten
6/1/2023
cs.LGq-bio.BMq-bio.QM

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Machine learning-based design has gained traction in the sciences, most notably in the design of small molecules, materials, and proteins, with societal implications spanning drug development and manufacturing, plastic degradation, and carbon sequestration. When designing objects to achieve novel property values with machine learning, one faces a fundamental challenge: how to push past the frontier of current knowledge, distilled from the training data into the model, in a manner that rationally controls the risk of failure. If one trusts learned models too much in extrapolation, one is likely to design rubbish. In contrast, if one does not extrapolate, one cannot find novelty. Herein, we ponder how one might strike a useful balance between these two extremes. We focus in particular on designing proteins with novel property values, although much of our discussion addresses machine learning-based design more broadly.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{fannjiang2023novelty,
  title  = {Is novelty predictable?},
  author = {Clara Fannjiang and Jennifer Listgarten},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.00872},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00872v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.00872.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.00872)

Discussion