Quantifying Deep Learning Model Uncertainty in Conformal Prediction

Hamed Karimi, Reza Samavi
6/1/2023
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 6 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Precise estimation of predictive uncertainty in deep neural networks is a critical requirement for reliable decision-making in machine learning and statistical modeling, particularly in the context of medical AI. Conformal Prediction (CP) has emerged as a promising framework for representing the model uncertainty by providing well-calibrated confidence levels for individual predictions. However, the quantification of model uncertainty in conformal prediction remains an active research area, yet to be fully addressed. In this paper, we explore state-of-the-art CP methodologies and their theoretical foundations. We propose a probabilistic approach in quantifying the model uncertainty derived from the produced prediction sets in conformal prediction and provide certified boundaries for the computed uncertainty. By doing so, we allow model uncertainty measured by CP to be compared by other uncertainty quantification methods such as Bayesian (e.g., MC-Dropout and DeepEnsemble) and Evidential approaches.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 6 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{karimi2023quantifying,
  title  = {Quantifying Deep Learning Model Uncertainty in Conformal Prediction},
  author = {Hamed Karimi and Reza Samavi},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.00876},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00876v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.00876.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.00876)

Discussion