Does Character-level Information Always Improve DRS-based Semantic Parsing?

Tomoya Kurosawa, Hitomi Yanaka
6/4/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Even in the era of massive language models, it has been suggested that character-level representations improve the performance of neural models. The state-of-the-art neural semantic parser for Discourse Representation Structures uses character-level representations, improving performance in the four languages (i.e., English, German, Dutch, and Italian) in the Parallel Meaning Bank dataset. However, how and why character-level information improves the parser's performance remains unclear. This study provides an in-depth analysis of performance changes by order of character sequences. In the experiments, we compare F1-scores by shuffling the order and randomizing character sequences after testing the performance of character-level information. Our results indicate that incorporating character-level information does not improve the performance in English and German. In addition, we find that the parser is not sensitive to correct character order in Dutch. Nevertheless, performance improvements are observed when using character-level information.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kurosawa2023does,
  title  = {Does Character-level Information Always Improve DRS-based Semantic Parsing?},
  author = {Tomoya Kurosawa and Hitomi Yanaka},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.02302},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02302v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.02302.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.02302)

Discussion