Bad Habits: Policy Confounding and Out-of-Trajectory Generalization in RL

Miguel Suau, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Frans A. Oliehoek
6/4/2023
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning agents tend to develop habits that are effective only under specific policies. Following an initial exploration phase where agents try out different actions, they eventually converge onto a particular policy. As this occurs, the distribution over state-action trajectories becomes narrower, leading agents to repeatedly experience the same transitions. This repetitive exposure fosters spurious correlations between certain observations and rewards. Agents may then pick up on these correlations and develop simplistic habits tailored to the specific set of trajectories dictated by their policy. The problem is that these habits may yield incorrect outcomes when agents are forced to deviate from their typical trajectories, prompted by changes in the environment. This paper presents a mathematical characterization of this phenomenon, termed policy confounding, and illustrates, through a series of examples, the circumstances under which it occurs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{suau2023habits,
  title  = {Bad Habits: Policy Confounding and Out-of-Trajectory Generalization in RL},
  author = {Miguel Suau and Matthijs T. J. Spaan and Frans A. Oliehoek},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.02419},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02419v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.02419.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.02419)

Discussion