MidMed: Towards Mixed-Type Dialogues for Medical Consultation

Xiaoming Shi, Zeming Liu, Chuan Wang, Haitao Leng, Kui Xue +2 more
6/5/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: xmshi-trio/MidMed (8 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-02-19).

Abstract

Most medical dialogue systems assume that patients have clear goals (medicine querying, surgical operation querying, etc.) before medical consultation. However, in many real scenarios, due to the lack of medical knowledge, it is usually difficult for patients to determine clear goals with all necessary slots. In this paper, we identify this challenge as how to construct medical consultation dialogue systems to help patients clarify their goals. To mitigate this challenge, we propose a novel task and create a human-to-human mixed-type medical consultation dialogue corpus, termed MidMed, covering five dialogue types: task-oriented dialogue for diagnosis, recommendation, knowledge-grounded dialogue, QA, and chitchat. MidMed covers four departments (otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, skin, and digestive system), with 8,175 dialogues. Furthermore, we build baselines on MidMed and propose an instruction-guiding medical dialogue generation framework, termed InsMed, to address this task. Experimental results show the effectiveness of InsMed.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

xmshi-trio/MidMedCommunity100%
MIT

MidMed: Towards Mixed-Type Dialogues for Medical Consultation

80May 23, 20232 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shi2023midmed,
  title  = {MidMed: Towards Mixed-Type Dialogues for Medical Consultation},
  author = {Xiaoming Shi and Zeming Liu and Chuan Wang and Haitao Leng and Kui Xue and Xiaofan Zhang and Shaoting Zhang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.02923},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02923v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.02923.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.02923)

Discussion