Higher Chest X-ray Resolution Improves Classification Performance

Alessandro Wollek, Sardi Hyska, Bastian Sabel, Michael Ingrisch, Tobias Lasser
6/9/2023
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Deep learning models for image classification are often trained at a resolution of 224 x 224 pixels for historical and efficiency reasons. However, chest X-rays are acquired at a much higher resolution to display subtle pathologies. This study investigates the effect of training resolution on chest X-ray classification performance, using the chest X-ray 14 dataset. The results show that training with a higher image resolution, specifically 1024 x 1024 pixels, results in the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 84.2 % compared to 82.7 % when trained with 256 x 256 pixel images. Additionally, comparison of bounding boxes and GradCAM saliency maps suggest that low resolutions, such as 256 x 256 pixels, are insufficient for identifying small pathologies and force the model to use spurious discriminating features. Our code is publicly available at https://gitlab.lrz.de/IP/cxr-resolution

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wollek2023higher,
  title  = {Higher Chest X-ray Resolution Improves Classification Performance},
  author = {Alessandro Wollek and Sardi Hyska and Bastian Sabel and Michael Ingrisch and Tobias Lasser},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.06051},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06051v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.06051.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.06051)

Discussion