Quality and Efficiency of Manual Annotation: Pre-annotation Bias

Marie Mikulová, Milan Straka, Jan Štěpánek, Barbora Štěpánková, Jan Hajič
6/15/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of annotation using an automatic pre-annotation for a mid-level annotation complexity task -- dependency syntax annotation. It compares the annotation efforts made by annotators using a pre-annotated version (with a high-accuracy parser) and those made by fully manual annotation. The aim of the experiment is to judge the final annotation quality when pre-annotation is used. In addition, it evaluates the effect of automatic linguistically-based (rule-formulated) checks and another annotation on the same data available to the annotators, and their influence on annotation quality and efficiency. The experiment confirmed that the pre-annotation is an efficient tool for faster manual syntactic annotation which increases the consistency of the resulting annotation without reducing its quality.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mikulov2023quality,
  title  = {Quality and Efficiency of Manual Annotation: Pre-annotation Bias},
  author = {Marie Mikulová and Milan Straka and Jan Štěpánek and Barbora Štěpánková and Jan Hajič},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.09307},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09307v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.09307.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.09307)

Discussion