Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?

Yusuf Sale, Michele Caprio, Eyke Hüllermeier
6/16/2023
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Adequate uncertainty representation and quantification have become imperative in various scientific disciplines, especially in machine learning and artificial intelligence. As an alternative to representing uncertainty via one single probability measure, we consider credal sets (convex sets of probability measures). The geometric representation of credal sets as $d$-dimensional polytopes implies a geometric intuition about (epistemic) uncertainty. In this paper, we show that the volume of the geometric representation of a credal set is a meaningful measure of epistemic uncertainty in the case of binary classification, but less so for multi-class classification. Our theoretical findings highlight the crucial role of specifying and employing uncertainty measures in machine learning in an appropriate way, and for being aware of possible pitfalls.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sale2023volume,
  title  = {Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?},
  author = {Yusuf Sale and Michele Caprio and Eyke Hüllermeier},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.09586},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09586v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.09586.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.09586)

Discussion