Optimal Cross-Validation for Sparse Linear Regression

Ryan Cory-Wright, Andrés Gómez
6/26/2023
math.OCcs.LGstat.ME

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Given a high-dimensional covariate matrix and a response vector, ridge-regularized sparse linear regression selects a subset of features that explains the relationship between covariates and the response in an interpretable manner. To select the sparsity and robustness of linear regressors, techniques like k-fold cross-validation are commonly used for hyperparameter tuning. However, cross-validation substantially increases the computational cost of sparse regression as it requires solving many mixed-integer optimization problems (MIOs) for each hyperparameter combination. To improve upon this state of affairs, we obtain computationally tractable relaxations of k-fold cross-validation metrics, facilitating hyperparameter selection after solving 50-80% fewer MIOs in practice. These relaxations result in an efficient cyclic coordinate descent scheme, achieving 10%-30% lower validation errors than via traditional methods such as grid search with MCP or GLMNet across a suite of 13 real-world datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{corywright2023optimal,
  title  = {Optimal Cross-Validation for Sparse Linear Regression},
  author = {Ryan Cory-Wright and Andrés Gómez},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.14851},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14851v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.14851.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.14851)

Discussion