C-PMI: Conditional Pointwise Mutual Information for Turn-level Dialogue Evaluation

Liliang Ren, Mankeerat Sidhu, Qi Zeng, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Heng Ji +1 more
6/27/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Existing reference-free turn-level evaluation metrics for chatbots inadequately capture the interaction between the user and the system. Consequently, they often correlate poorly with human evaluations. To address this issue, we propose a novel model-agnostic approach that leverages Conditional Pointwise Mutual Information (C-PMI) to measure the turn-level interaction between the system and the user based on a given evaluation dimension. Experimental results on the widely used FED dialogue evaluation dataset demonstrate that our approach significantly improves the correlation with human judgment compared with existing evaluation systems. By replacing the negative log-likelihood-based scorer with our proposed C-PMI scorer, we achieve a relative 62.6% higher Spearman correlation on average for the FED evaluation metric. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/renll/C-PMI.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ren2023cpmi,
  title  = {C-PMI: Conditional Pointwise Mutual Information for Turn-level Dialogue Evaluation},
  author = {Liliang Ren and Mankeerat Sidhu and Qi Zeng and Revanth Gangi Reddy and Heng Ji and ChengXiang Zhai},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.15245},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15245v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.15245.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.15245)

Discussion