Empirically Validating Conformal Prediction on Modern Vision Architectures Under Distribution Shift and Long-tailed Data

Kevin Kasa, Graham W. Taylor
7/3/2023
cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Conformal prediction has emerged as a rigorous means of providing deep learning models with reliable uncertainty estimates and safety guarantees. Yet, its performance is known to degrade under distribution shift and long-tailed class distributions, which are often present in real world applications. Here, we characterize the performance of several post-hoc and training-based conformal prediction methods under these settings, providing the first empirical evaluation on large-scale datasets and models. We show that across numerous conformal methods and neural network families, performance greatly degrades under distribution shifts violating safety guarantees. Similarly, we show that in long-tailed settings the guarantees are frequently violated on many classes. Understanding the limitations of these methods is necessary for deployment in real world and safety-critical applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kasa2023empirically,
  title  = {Empirically Validating Conformal Prediction on Modern Vision Architectures Under Distribution Shift and Long-tailed Data},
  author = {Kevin Kasa and Graham W. Taylor},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.01088},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01088v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.01088.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.01088)

Discussion