To be or not to be: a translation reception study of a literary text translated into Dutch and Catalan using machine translation

Ana Guerberof Arenas, Antonio Toral
7/5/2023
cs.CLcs.HC

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study involving the reception of a fictional story by Kurt Vonnegut translated from English into Catalan and Dutch in three conditions: machine-translated (MT), post-edited (PE) and translated from scratch (HT). 223 participants were recruited who rated the reading conditions using three scales: Narrative Engagement, Enjoyment and Translation Reception. The results show that HT presented a higher engagement, enjoyment and translation reception in Catalan if compared to PE and MT. However, the Dutch readers show higher scores in PE than in both HT and MT, and the highest engagement and enjoyments scores are reported when reading the original English version. We hypothesize that when reading a fictional story in translation, not only the condition and the quality of the translations is key to understand its reception, but also the participants reading patterns, reading language, and, perhaps language status in their own societies.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{arenas2023translation,
  title  = {To be or not to be: a translation reception study of a literary text translated into Dutch and Catalan using machine translation},
  author = {Ana Guerberof Arenas and Antonio Toral},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.02358},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02358v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.02358.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.02358)

Discussion