Sup-Norm Convergence of Deep Neural Network Estimator for Nonparametric Regression by Adversarial Training

Masaaki Imaizumi
7/8/2023
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We show the sup-norm convergence of deep neural network estimators with a novel adversarial training scheme. For the nonparametric regression problem, it has been shown that an estimator using deep neural networks can achieve better performances in the sense of the $L2$-norm. In contrast, it is difficult for the neural estimator with least-squares to achieve the sup-norm convergence, due to the deep structure of neural network models. In this study, we develop an adversarial training scheme and investigate the sup-norm convergence of deep neural network estimators. First, we find that ordinary adversarial training makes neural estimators inconsistent. Second, we show that a deep neural network estimator achieves the optimal rate in the sup-norm sense by the proposed adversarial training with correction. We extend our adversarial training to general setups of a loss function and a data-generating function. Our experiments support the theoretical findings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{imaizumi2023supnorm,
  title  = {Sup-Norm Convergence of Deep Neural Network Estimator for Nonparametric Regression by Adversarial Training},
  author = {Masaaki Imaizumi},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.04042},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04042v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.04042.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.04042)

Discussion