Measuring and Mitigating Interference in Reinforcement Learning

Vincent Liu, Han Wang, Ruo Yu Tao, Khurram Javed, Adam White +1 more
7/10/2023
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Catastrophic interference is common in many network-based learning systems, and many proposals exist for mitigating it. Before overcoming interference we must understand it better. In this work, we provide a definition and novel measure of interference for value-based reinforcement learning methods such as Fitted Q-Iteration and DQN. We systematically evaluate our measure of interference, showing that it correlates with instability in control performance, across a variety of network architectures. Our new interference measure allows us to ask novel scientific questions about commonly used deep learning architectures and study learning algorithms which mitigate interference. Lastly, we outline a class of algorithms which we call online-aware that are designed to mitigate interference, and show they do reduce interference according to our measure and that they improve stability and performance in several classic control environments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2023measuring,
  title  = {Measuring and Mitigating Interference in Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Vincent Liu and Han Wang and Ruo Yu Tao and Khurram Javed and Adam White and Martha White},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.04887},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04887v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.04887.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.04887)

Discussion