Stable Normative Explanations: From Argumentation to Deontic Logic

Cecilia Di Florio, Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor
7/11/2023
cs.AIcs.LO

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation. With this done, we discuss the deontic meaning of this reconstruction and show how to build from argumentation neighborhood structures for deontic logic where this notion of explanation can be characterised. Some direct complexity results are offered.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Understanding XAI Through the Philosopher's Lens: A Historical Perspective

79% match2024

Change in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation: Sufficient, Necessary, and Counterfactual Explanations

77% match2025

Non-flat ABA is an Instance of Bipolar Argumentation

77% match2023

Rejecting Arguments Based on Doubt in Structured Bipolar Argumentation

77% match2026

Explaining Non-monotonic Normative Reasoning using Argumentation Theory with Deontic Logic

77% match2024

A Communication-First Account of Explanation

77% match2025

Cite this paper

@article{florio2023stable,
  title  = {Stable Normative Explanations: From Argumentation to Deontic Logic},
  author = {Cecilia Di Florio and Guido Governatori and Antonino Rotolo and Giovanni Sartor},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.05156},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05156v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.05156.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.05156)

Discussion