Impact of Feature Encoding on Malware Classification Explainability

Elyes Manai, Mohamed Mejri, Jaouhar Fattahi
7/10/2023
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of feature encoding techniques on the explainability of XAI (Explainable Artificial Intelligence) algorithms. Using a malware classification dataset, we trained an XGBoost model and compared the performance of two feature encoding methods: Label Encoding (LE) and One Hot Encoding (OHE). Our findings reveal a marginal performance loss when using OHE instead of LE. However, the more detailed explanations provided by OHE compensated for this loss. We observed that OHE enables deeper exploration of details in both global and local contexts, facilitating more comprehensive answers. Additionally, we observed that using OHE resulted in smaller explanation files and reduced analysis time for human analysts. These findings emphasize the significance of considering feature encoding techniques in XAI research and suggest potential for further exploration by incorporating additional encoding methods and innovative visualization approaches.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{manai2023impact,
  title  = {Impact of Feature Encoding on Malware Classification Explainability},
  author = {Elyes Manai and Mohamed Mejri and Jaouhar Fattahi},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.05614},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05614v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.05614.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.05614)

Discussion