Assessment of the suitability of degradation models for the planning of CCTV inspections of sewer pipes

Fidae El Morer, Stefan Wittek, Andreas Rausch
7/12/2023
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The degradation of sewer pipes poses significant economical, environmental and health concerns. The maintenance of such assets requires structured plans to perform inspections, which are more efficient when structural and environmental features are considered along with the results of previous inspection reports. The development of such plans requires degradation models that can be based on statistical and machine learning methods. This work proposes a methodology to assess their suitability to plan inspections considering three dimensions: accuracy metrics, ability to produce long-term degradation curves and explainability. Results suggest that although ensemble models yield the highest accuracy, they are unable to infer the long-term degradation of the pipes, whereas the Logistic Regression offers a slightly less accurate model that is able to produce consistent degradation curves with a high explainability. A use case is presented to demonstrate this methodology and the efficiency of model-based planning compared to the current inspection plan.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{morer2023assessment,
  title  = {Assessment of the suitability of degradation models for the planning of CCTV inspections of sewer pipes},
  author = {Fidae El Morer and Stefan Wittek and Andreas Rausch},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.06341},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06341v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.06341.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.06341)

Discussion