Automated Ableism: An Exploration of Explicit Disability Biases in Sentiment and Toxicity Analysis Models

Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Mukund Srinath, Shomir Wilson
7/18/2023
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We analyze sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models to detect the presence of explicit bias against people with disability (PWD). We employ the bias identification framework of Perturbation Sensitivity Analysis to examine conversations related to PWD on social media platforms, specifically Twitter and Reddit, in order to gain insight into how disability bias is disseminated in real-world social settings. We then create the \textit{Bias Identification Test in Sentiment} (BITS) corpus to quantify explicit disability bias in any sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models. Our study utilizes BITS to uncover significant biases in four open AIaaS (AI as a Service) sentiment analysis tools, namely TextBlob, VADER, Google Cloud Natural Language API, DistilBERT and two toxicity detection models, namely two versions of Toxic-BERT. Our findings indicate that all of these models exhibit statistically significant explicit bias against PWD.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{venkit2023automated,
  title  = {Automated Ableism: An Exploration of Explicit Disability Biases in Sentiment and Toxicity Analysis Models},
  author = {Pranav Narayanan Venkit and Mukund Srinath and Shomir Wilson},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.09209},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09209v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.09209.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.09209)

Discussion