Can Instruction Fine-Tuned Language Models Identify Social Bias through Prompting?

Omkar Dige, Jacob-Junqi Tian, David Emerson, Faiza Khan Khattak
7/19/2023
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

As the breadth and depth of language model applications continue to expand rapidly, it is increasingly important to build efficient frameworks for measuring and mitigating the learned or inherited social biases of these models. In this paper, we present our work on evaluating instruction fine-tuned language models' ability to identify bias through zero-shot prompting, including Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts. Across LLaMA and its two instruction fine-tuned versions, Alpaca 7B performs best on the bias identification task with an accuracy of 56.7%. We also demonstrate that scaling up LLM size and data diversity could lead to further performance gain. This is a work-in-progress presenting the first component of our bias mitigation framework. We will keep updating this work as we get more results.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dige2023instruction,
  title  = {Can Instruction Fine-Tuned Language Models Identify Social Bias through Prompting?},
  author = {Omkar Dige and Jacob-Junqi Tian and David Emerson and Faiza Khan Khattak},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.10472},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10472v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.10472.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.10472)

Discussion