Training Quantum Boltzmann Machines with Coresets

Joshua Viszlai, Teague Tomesh, Pranav Gokhale, Eric Anschuetz, Frederic T. Chong
7/26/2023
quant-phcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Recent work has proposed and explored using coreset techniques for quantum algorithms that operate on classical data sets to accelerate the applicability of these algorithms on near-term quantum devices. We apply these ideas to Quantum Boltzmann Machines (QBM) where gradient-based steps which require Gibbs state sampling are the main computational bottleneck during training. By using a coreset in place of the full data set, we try to minimize the number of steps needed and accelerate the overall training time. In a regime where computational time on quantum computers is a precious resource, we propose this might lead to substantial practical savings. We evaluate this approach on 6x6 binary images from an augmented bars and stripes data set using a QBM with 36 visible units and 8 hidden units. Using an Inception score inspired metric, we compare QBM training times with and without using coresets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{viszlai2023training,
  title  = {Training Quantum Boltzmann Machines with Coresets},
  author = {Joshua Viszlai and Teague Tomesh and Pranav Gokhale and Eric Anschuetz and Frederic T. Chong},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.14459},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14459v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.14459.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.14459)

Discussion