The Co-12 Recipe for Evaluating Interpretable Part-Prototype Image Classifiers

Meike Nauta, Christin Seifert
7/26/2023
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Interpretable part-prototype models are computer vision models that are explainable by design. The models learn prototypical parts and recognise these components in an image, thereby combining classification and explanation. Despite the recent attention for intrinsically interpretable models, there is no comprehensive overview on evaluating the explanation quality of interpretable part-prototype models. Based on the Co-12 properties for explanation quality as introduced in arXiv:2201.08164 (e.g., correctness, completeness, compactness), we review existing work that evaluates part-prototype models, reveal research gaps and outline future approaches for evaluation of the explanation quality of part-prototype models. This paper, therefore, contributes to the progression and maturity of this relatively new research field on interpretable part-prototype models. We additionally provide a ``Co-12 cheat sheet'' that acts as a concise summary of our findings on evaluating part-prototype models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{nauta2023co,
  title  = {The Co-12 Recipe for Evaluating Interpretable Part-Prototype Image Classifiers},
  author = {Meike Nauta and Christin Seifert},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.14517},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14517v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.14517.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.14517)

Discussion