Small, but important: Traffic light proposals for detecting small traffic lights and beyond

Tom Sanitz, Christian Wilms, Simone Frintrop
7/27/2023
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Traffic light detection is a challenging problem in the context of self-driving cars and driver assistance systems. While most existing systems produce good results on large traffic lights, detecting small and tiny ones is often overlooked. A key problem here is the inherent downsampling in CNNs, leading to low-resolution features for detection. To mitigate this problem, we propose a new traffic light detection system, comprising a novel traffic light proposal generator that utilizes findings from general object proposal generation, fine-grained multi-scale features, and attention for efficient processing. Moreover, we design a new detection head for classifying and refining our proposals. We evaluate our system on three challenging, publicly available datasets and compare it against six methods. The results show substantial improvements of at least $12.6\%$ on small and tiny traffic lights, as well as strong results across all sizes of traffic lights.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{sanitz2023small,
  title  = {Small, but important: Traffic light proposals for detecting small traffic lights and beyond},
  author = {Tom Sanitz and Christian Wilms and Simone Frintrop},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.15191},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15191v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.15191.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.15191)

Discussion