Towards Practical Robustness Auditing for Linear Regression

Daniel Freund, Samuel B. Hopkins
7/30/2023
stat.MEcs.LGecon.EM

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We investigate practical algorithms to find or disprove the existence of small subsets of a dataset which, when removed, reverse the sign of a coefficient in an ordinary least squares regression involving that dataset. We empirically study the performance of well-established algorithmic techniques for this task -- mixed integer quadratically constrained optimization for general linear regression problems and exact greedy methods for special cases. We show that these methods largely outperform the state of the art and provide a useful robustness check for regression problems in a few dimensions. However, significant computational bottlenecks remain, especially for the important task of disproving the existence of such small sets of influential samples for regression problems of dimension $3$ or greater. We make some headway on this challenge via a spectral algorithm using ideas drawn from recent innovations in algorithmic robust statistics. We summarize the limitations of known techniques in several challenge datasets to encourage further algorithmic innovation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{freund2023towards,
  title  = {Towards Practical Robustness Auditing for Linear Regression},
  author = {Daniel Freund and Samuel B. Hopkins},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.16315},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16315v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.16315.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.16315)

Discussion