Camoscio: an Italian Instruction-tuned LLaMA

Andrea Santilli, Emanuele Rodolà
7/31/2023
cs.CL

Official code: teelinsan/camoscio (126 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2023-12-05).

Abstract

In recent years Large Language Models (LLMs) have increased the state of the art on several natural language processing tasks. However, their accessibility is often limited to paid API services, posing challenges for researchers in conducting extensive investigations. On the other hand, while some open-source models have been proposed by the community, they are typically English-centric or multilingual without a specific adaptation for the Italian language. In an effort to democratize the available and open resources for the Italian language, in this paper we introduce Camoscio: a language model specifically tuned to follow users' prompts in Italian. Specifically, we finetuned the smallest variant of LLaMA (7b) with LoRA on a corpus of instruction prompts translated to Italian via ChatGPT. Results indicate that the model's zero-shot performance on various downstream tasks in Italian competes favorably with existing models specifically finetuned for those tasks. All the artifacts (code, dataset, model) are released to the community at the following url: https://github.com/teelinsan/camoscio

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

teelinsan/camoscioOfficial100%
Apache-2.0

Camoscio: An Italian instruction-tuned language model based on LLaMA

12610Shell, PythonMar 23, 20232 years agoApache-2.0
italianlanguage-modelllamatransformers

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{santilli2023camoscio,
  title  = {Camoscio: an Italian Instruction-tuned LLaMA},
  author = {Andrea Santilli and Emanuele Rodolà},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2307.16456},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16456v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2307.16456.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2307.16456)

Discussion